Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Blog

If you have been arrested for driving under the influence in Los Angeles, your world can turn upside down in just hours. Whether you were incorrectly assessed as DUI (the police made a mistake on your blood work or breathalyzer reading), or you were barely over California’s legal limit of 0.08% BAC, you could face stiff fines, jail time, and other penalties. Obviously, DUI is a serious offense. But a breaking story out of Seattle illustrates why Los Angeles DUI defendants -- more, it seems, than other criminal defendants -- face such a tough road to rehabiliate their images.

Warning: The following story is disturbing.

Last week, police arrested a 34-year-old man, Shawn Shipp, for vehicular homicide while DUI. Shipp backed into 91-year old Marie Fite, slamming her to the ground. Instead of stopping, he continued to back up, apparently unaware that he had hit a human being. By the time he figured it out, Fite had been severely injured. Shipp fled the scene, but police chased him down and arrested him. Fite died at the hospital. Shipp tested to have a blood alcohol concentration of 0.16% – twice both the Washington and Southern California DUI limit of 0.08%. On top of that, Shipp has a long rap sheet which includes drug possession, motor vehicle theft, assault, driving with a suspended license, and first degree child rape. According to reports, Shipp’s bail has been set at $500,000.

Now, obviously, without knowing more details about the allegations or about specifically what happened, one has to withhold judgment. After all, in the U.S. court system, a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. Nevertheless, the salacious details of the report – including the fact that Shipp is a convicted child rapist – obviously touch an emotional chord in us.

Unfortunately, if you have been tagged with a charge of driving under the influence in Long Beach, many people instinctively will conclude that you must be somehow similar to this Shipp character. And while it is true that driving DUI in Long Beach or elsewhere can be incredibly dangerous and can lead to tragic instances of vehicular homicide, the harsh stereotyping of DUI defendants may not be fair or accurate.

That said, it’s always important to review what punishments can be in store for individuals convicted of serious Los Angeles DUI crimes. Cases in which a DUI victim dies can be charged under the California Vehicular Manslaughter Law. Penal Code section 191.5(a) covers gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated. This is a more serious charge than typical vehicular manslaughter charge. Prosecutors must prove four points:

1. Driver was DUI and/or had a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% or greater.
2. The person committed a driving infraction or misdemeanor while driving – or performed an otherwise lawful act – that could potentially lead to someone’s death.
3. That lawful act, or infraction or misdemeanor, was committed with “gross negligence.”
4. The negligent conduct resulted in someone getting killed.

If the prosecution cannot prove all four points, they will have a hard time getting a conviction for gross vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated. However, prosecutors can choose from an array of charges and request penalties to punish guilty offenders.

Continue reading "Horrific Case Out of Seattle Illustrates Why Los Angeles DUI Defendants Often Have Such a Hard Road" »

The epidemic of celebrity Southern California DUI stories has provoked a national discussion over policy and road safety. Just last week, for instance, as this blog reported, Corey Dillon -- a former NFL runningback and a member of the 2004 Patriots (Super Bowl Champions) -- was arrested for driving under the influence in Malibu. Stories like Dillon’s break all the time, unfortunately, sending the wrong message to impressionable drivers. These incidents sear into the collective memory. Who could forget the Nick Nolte DUI mugshot or the loaded comments Mel Gibson allegedly made after his DUI arrest? Truly outlandish DUIs happen to “everyday” people, as well. Here are three fascinating examples from the DUI news annals:

1. DUI Driver Injures Judge who Originally Sentenced Him for DUI

This story, from mid-April out of Maryland, is both ironic and tragic. A driver named Rene Fernandez careened into a car containing Judge Edwin Collier and his wife Ellen, causing severe injuries to both husband and wife. Fernandez had come before Judge Collier more than a decade ago on charges of DUI. Collier gave him a suspended sentence – let him go without jail time.

2. Women Arrested for Driving DUI on Train Tracks

This is a story from late February 2010 in Redding, Pennsylvania. A local 65-year-old woman named Bonnie Lehfeldt was driving after her dog who had gotten loose. Her Nissan Sedan got stuck on some train tracks. A local man managed to pull her from her car in the nick of time – right before a train plowed into the Nissan and pushed it for 200 feet. Had Lehfeldt been in the car when the collision occurred, she likely would have been killed or at least seriously injured. Police arrested her for DUI.

3. DUI while Piloting a Motorized Armchair

This story, from November of last year, involved a 61-year-old man who drove a motorized armchair out of a pub and into a parking lot while having a blood alcohol concentration of three times the legal limit.

Remember, even if you are not driving a car, truck, or motorcycle, you can still be pulled over for driving under the influence in Southern California!

California Vehicle Code Sections 23153(a) and 23153(b) govern what happens in cases of driving under the influence in Los Angeles with injury. Depending on the circumstances of the injury, the DUI driver can be hit with a felony charge (instead of a standard misdemeanor) and, as a result, can face much stricter penalties including the loss of the right to vote as well as higher fines and longer jail time.

Whether you have been pulled over for a “standard” Los Angeles DUI or a complicated injury DUI in Los Angeles, you likely need effective and compassionate help with your legal case.

Continue reading "As if Celebrity Southern California DUI Arrests were Not Wild Enough… 3 Totally Bizarre DUI News Stories" »

Websites like RadarOnline, PopEater, and Perez Hilton’s blog constantly report on the latest celebrity Los Angeles DUI news. Over the past decade alone, we have seen some of our most beloved TV and movie stars -- including Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton, Nick Nolte, Stephanie Pratt and, perhaps most famously, Mel Gibson -- get arrested for DUI in Los Angeles (and elsewhere). But one DUI-related story that’s often not covered by the “mainstream” celebrity blog-press is the rash of lawnmower DUI arrests -- a crime that appears to be becoming increasingly common, however bizarre it may seem to most readers.

Consider the following stories that have broken just in the past month alone.

1. On April 6th, a 47-year-old Lancaster, New York resident named Joseph Simme was arrested after driving under the influence on his lawnmower on Walden Avenue. He nearly hit several vehicles. Fortunately, police pulled him over and found that he had many prior DWI charges as well as a revoked license. Upon testing, it was revealed that he had a BAC of 0.14% (remember, the legal limit for Southern California DUI is 0.08%). He was charged with multiple felony counts.

2. Just six days later -- on April 12th, a man named Martin McMurray of Blountville, Indiana was also busted for lawnmower DUI, after leading police on a low-speed chase for nearly half a mile (thus despite the fact that police loudspeakers were blaring and sirens were wailing). McMurray allegedly drove against traffic and nearly lost his balance after being pulled over.

3. Just two days after that, on April 14th, a 30-year-old man named Jimmy Graham Jr. was busted in Athens, Tennessee for DUI on a lawnmower. He allegedly stole some fishing poles from a local resident’s garage and then took off on his lawnmower. He is currently charged with theft and aggravated burglary as well as DUI.

Could a lawnmower DUI in Los Angeles be next?

Perhaps not. Remember, Los Angeles is an urban environment. All aforementioned arrests happened in the suburbs/rural areas. And fewer people ride lawnmowers here, so one might expect fewer lawnmower Los Angeles DUIs. Nevertheless, the prospect of a lawnmower Southern California DUI does loom large, particularly as spring blooms and we head into summer -- when the bulk of lawn maintenance is done in Southern California.

Of course, as intriguing as lawnmower DUI might be to the casual reader, the charge of a Long Beach DUI is no laughing matter, neither for defendants, nor for the victims of any DUI accident.

If you or a loved one has been tagged for driving under the influence in Long Beach, you may need legal representation.

Continue reading "More Bizarre than Even the Most Outlandish Celebrity Southern California DUI Charges -- Lawnmower DUIs!" »

Most Southern California DUI cases involve simple roadside stops or failures at sobriety checkpoints. These stops tend to be no-drama affairs -- perhaps involving someone driving under the influence in Burbank with a BAC of 0.09% following a night out at a bar in the town center.

But every once in a while, truly bizarre DUI arrests occur. The website TruTV.com recently put up an amusing catalog of notoriously strange DUI arrests. These include:

o Afredo Martinez of Reno, who allowed his 7-year old son to get behind the wheel;
o Tina Williams, who continued to drink beer in front of the police while being questioned about driving DUI -- all while a 16-month year old infant was in her car!
o Lynn Bailey, who got pulled over in Florida while wearing a shirt that read “I’m Not an Alcoholic. I’m a Drunk. Alcoholics go to meetings.”
o A Reno woman named April Westfall, who had been driving around with six feet of gas station hose sticking out of her tank when she got pulled over for suspicion of DUI.

Other bizarre stories of Southern California DUI (and DUI elsewhere in the US) include:

o A husband who pulled over his own wife for DUI;
o A father jacked up on cocaine who allowed a 10-year old boy to drive his vehicle -- the 10-year-old crashed the car at over 100 miles per hour;
o A woman named Terri Comer, who passed out behind the wheel of her Toyota with a BAC of a mind-boggling 0.72% (9 times the legal limit for a Southern California DUI) -- right next to a flashing road sign lit up with the words “don’t drink and drive.”

As amusing as these accounts of bizarre arrests may be, they demonstrate just how helpless many drivers are to control themselves and their behavior. When someone drives under the influence in Beverly Hills or Glendale, that person puts others at risk. What’s more, punishments for DUI with injury can be far more severe.

Consider that most DUI stops lead to charges under either California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) or 23152(b) but that DUI injury is charged under two separate statutes, 23153(a) and 23153(b). These other statutes stipulate that standard misdemeanor DUI charges can be inflated to felony counts if a DUI driver hurts another person. The severe punishments could entail lengthy prison sentences, forced restitution to a victim (or a victim’s family), major court fines, loss of a right to vote, loss of a job, and so on.

That said, just because someone drives DUI in Glendale and gets into an injury accident doesn’t necessarily mean that he or she will be charged under 23153(a) or 23153(b). To make a case, prosecutors must show that the driver violated a traffic law or in some other way behaved with negligence -- and that this behavior caused an accident, which in turn caused an injury. In other words, say you were DUI in Glendale and you hit another car, causing injury. If the other driver was solely responsible for the accident -- for instance, if his vehicle suddenly swerved into your lane -- you likely will not be hit with the tougher charges, although you likely will still face charges under 23152(a) and/or 23152(b).

Continue reading "Completely Bizarre Southern California DUI Stories (and stories from elsewhere in the U.S.)" »

California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b) stipulates that anyone who drives a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) in excess of 0.08 percent is considered in violation of the law and can be arrested for Southern California DUI.

If you're convicted, you can go to jail, be forced to pay exorbitant fees and court costs, lose your California driver’s license for a whole year, be forced to install and maintain an interlock ignition device, and face other punishments as well as strict probation terms.

While 0.08 percent is a statewide standard, the rules are different -- and stricter -- for drivers under the age of 21 years. According to Section 23140 of the California Vehicle Code, anyone under 21 years who drives with a BAC of 0.05 percent or greater is breaking the law. Police can arrest you, and your license can be suspended for a full year.

The zero tolerance law is even stricter. According to California Vehicle Code Section 23136, anyone under 21 years who has a BAC of just 0.01 percent or greater can be penalized with a one to three year license suspension. A police officer can take away your driver’s license and give it back to the Department of Motor Vehicles.

According to official Los Angeles Police Department figures, as based on the US Department of Transportation’s Fatality Analysis Reporting System, California often leads the nation in the number of road-related traffic fatalities. This is partly due to the fact that the state has so many people and so many cars (and so few public transportation options, at least in Southern California).

Minors often do not realize the potency of the alcohol that they consume -- particularly as it relates to their driving prowess. Drinking alcohol has been shown to slow reaction times, impair concentration, reduce range of vision, and stoke reckless behavior.

Los Angeles DUI and Hollywood DUI crashes involving young people can lead to awful catastrophes -- affecting not only the lives of promising students, athletes, and citizens, but also the lives of other people in the community.

Myriad rules govern driving restrictions on minors. As we’ve discussed, CVC Sections 23136, 23140, 23152 can all be relevant, depending on the details of your Beverly Hills DUI charge. It makes sense to seek advice from a highly regarded, experienced Los Angeles DUI trial attorney.

Continue reading " Los Angeles DUI Rules for Drivers Under the Age of Twenty-One" »

Los Angeles DUI statisticians often chart the rise and fall of fortunes of local movie stars, politicians, and actors. But this post will examine something a little less personal but potentially pretty intriguing; namely, what is the record number of Los Angeles DUI arrests for a single person?

According to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) statistics put out in 2009, nearly 400,000 people in the U.S. have at least five DUI convictions on their records. Extrapolating from the numbers, it is safe to say that several thousand people have ten DUI arrests or more. One online search reports that an individual in Illinois got a whopping 22 DUI convictions!

An AP story from April 12th has reported that a 49-year old man named Thaylin Shawn Pierce of Billings, Montana recently pled guilty to his 11th DUI. This comes on the heels of an arrest made back in November 2008, when Pierce was pulled over near a casino with a BAC in excess of 0.09%. (Remember that California’s legal limit, according to California Vehicle Code Section 23152 (b) is 0.08%).

If you drive with this much alcohol in your system or more, you can be subjected to arrest and penalties ranging from points on your license to loss of your license to jail time to mandatory installation of interlock ignition device (IID) on your vehicle, which you will have to pay for and maintain.

If you are arrested four or more times for DUI in Beverly Hills, for instance, within a span of 10 years of less, you can be subject to intense punishments. These include a minimum of 180 days in jail – that’s if the charge is only a misdemeanor – if it’s a felony, you can have significantly more jail time – up to three years. You’ll also see your California license suspended for three years, and you won’t be eligible for a restricted license for either work or school for four whole years. In addition, you will have to attend DUI alcohol school for 18 months and you will likely face huge court costs and fines along with strict terms of probation.

If you are arrested for driving under the influence in Beverly Hills in conjunction with a hit-and-run injury accident or any accident that results in injury to another person, your charges can be higher still. The state does not look fondly upon recidivist (repeat) Southern California DUI offenders.

If you or a family member has been tagged for multiple Beverly Hills DUI arrests, what should you do?

In addition to seeking treatment ASAP for alcohol related problems, it may behoove you to connect with an attorney who you can explain your rights and responsibilities under the law.

Continue reading "What is the Record Number of Los Angeles DUI Arrests Any Single Person has Received?" »

According to California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b), a motorist who drives with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher can be arrested and charged with a Southern California DUI. Often, drivers significantly exceed this minimum number. But how bad can it get? We’re going to discuss the levels of impairment that affect drivers as their BAC levels increase.

Between 0.03% and 0.05% BAC, reaction time is slow, and certain commercial drivers may be considered DUI at this level. The American Medical Association (AMA) has recommended that states lower their legal limit to 0.05%.

0.08% – As we just discussed, this is the cut-off for Southern California DUI.

0.10% - Most people begin to experience a significant loss of coordination and balance as well as failure of muscle control. Other states (not California) have this marker as their legal limit.

0.17% – According to statistical analyses, this is the average BAC for drivers who get into fatal collisions.

0.20% – At this level, drivers lose control over their emotions.

0.30 to 0.35% – Blackouts, incoherence, and complete disorientation can occur at this level.

0.50% – This could cause death.

0.74% – This is the highest BAC level ever recorded by a hospital in the United States.

0.914% – In December 2004, a Bulgarian man who hit a car was taken to a hospital and measured to have a 0.914% BAC. The doctors were so stunned by this measurement that they tried him with five different tests, which supported this amazing BAC reading.

1.23% – a Polish man that same month (December 2004) was astonishingly measured to have a 1.23% BAC. Some people doubt the veracity of this claim.

Since 0.5% BAC is usually enough to lead to death, it’s very rare that people who endure BAC levels of 1% or higher survive, but such incidences apparently do occur from time to time.

How Do Police Test for DUI in Burbank?

One common method is the blood test. This is considered the most accurate method, although, as we will see, it is not necessarily foolproof. A technician will extract blood from a suspect’s vein. The sample is then mixed with certain chemicals, which prevent the blood from clotting, and the blood is then analyzed using series of tests and then sent back to the Law Enforcement Agency for analysis.

Many Things can Go Wrong with DUI in Burbank Blood Tests.

For instance, the sample may not be sterile, or it may not be preserved or refrigerated. The skin could be contaminated by alcohol swabbed on the area to prepare for the blood test. Samples can be mixed up. Errors can be made with the chain of custody. Errors can be made with respect to the chemicals used to prevent clotting and the tests used to analyze the blood.

Of course, since blood tests are generally the most reliable methods to test for BAC, if you’ve been arrested for driving under the influence in Burbank (or elsewhere in Southern California), and your BAC blood test comes up positive for DUI, you may need immediate legal assistance.

Continue reading "What is the Highest Ever BAC Recorded for Someone Pulled Over for Driving Under the Influence in Southern California (or elsewhere)?" »

Nearly every week, news reports announce yet another Burbank DUI arrest. The story lines range widely. Sometimes, it’s a B-List celebrity stopped for speeding on the 101 and found to have a blood alcohol concentration of 0.15%. Other times, it’s a case of an 18-year-old actor who drives after drinking at a house party and winds up totaling his car on Lankershim Blvd. The details and names change. But the story remains the same.

So what’s behind this epidemic?

Scientifically, it may be impossible to say. But we can offer some informed speculation about what might be driving (so to speak) at least some of the Burbank DUI epidemic.

1. Rapidly changing traffic patterns

During the daytime, freeways like the 5, the 101, and the 405 get totally clogged. If you are on these freeways at the wrong time, you may be stuck literally for hours. However, after the traffic “thaws” and the sun goes down, cars suddenly can go at a much more rapid clip. This huge difference in driver behavior (between trafficky times and non-trafficky times) can create confusion and make roads in the Valley more difficult to navigate than roads elsewhere in L.A.

2. It’s easy to get lost.

Okay, the Valley is not exactly Boston: its traffic grid is at least somewhat intelligible. And if you make a wrong turn, you won’t have to drive three miles before getting back on track. But signage can confuse easily. Many areas (particularly along Ventura Boulevard) “look like one another.” As a result, you have probably a higher than average contingent of drivers who don’t know where they are going or who may be searching for directions while driving.

3. Increase in cell phone use in automobiles.

Think back ten years ago. A few people in Burbank had cell phones and pagers and such. But today, cell phones are nearly ubiquitous. Despite California laws forbidding drivers to use mobile devices unless they use hands free headsets, the practical reality is that lots of drivers still talk on their phones by holding them up to their ears. This makes them more distracted and more likely to get into accidents. Thanks to the increased distractibility of drivers, the probability of Burbank DUI crashes goes way up.

4. Burbank is home to a lot of “out of the way” nightspots and clubs.

When you look at party areas of the city of Los Angeles -- such as the Sunset Strip in West Hollywood and Mainstreet in Santa Monica -- these places can be dangerous, sure, but they are at least concentrated in a relatively small location. In the Valley, things are different. Places to drink in Burbank are more spread out. As a result, drivers who hop from club to club or from party to party may be more likely to get into their cars, thus increasing the likelihood that they will get into a Burbank DUI accident or be subject to arrest for DUI in Southern California.

Two California Vehicle Code Sections define what it means to be DUI in Southern California -- sections 23152(a) and 23152(b). 23152(a) lays out the definition and potential punishments for California DUI. 23152(b) stipulates that if you drive a car, truck, or motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or above, you can be arrested for DUI.

So, with that lecture on the law and discussion of potential causes of DUI in Pasadena and Burbank and elsewhere in the Valley behind us, let’s turn our attention to legal defenses:

What should you do if you or a family member has been arrested for DUI?

Continue reading "Why Burbank DUI Accidents Happen -- And Steps You Can Take to Avoid Them" »

Most Southern California DUI news stories and blog posts report only on the latest headlines. But sometimes the most important stories percolate for weeks without getting due attention. To that end, let’s examine relevant developments that could impact your driving and your safety.

1. CHP will serve over 6,000 warrants for individuals who’ve ignored DUI court appearances.

According to official sources, the California Highway Patrol is going to serve 6,000 warrants for drivers who were caught driving under the influence in Southern California and elsewhere throughout the state who did not show up for court appearances. These warrants should be out by September 30th. Individuals who have outstanding warrants can turn themselves in. Celebrities are not exempt from this hunt. As this blog reported, Jani Lane, former lead singer of the band Warrant, was issued a warrant last month for failing to show up to a Los Angeles DUI hearing.

2. Increase in traffic fines may be impacting Southern California road safety.

On January 1st, 2009, the California legislature passed a law that increased fines for traffic infractions by up to 150%. The revenues from these fines have paid for construction of new courthouses. The imposition of higher fines should theoretically deter bad driving, but it is uncertain whether the deterrent works. More studies need to be done to demonstrate a clear cause and effect relationship.

3. Mandatory Interlock Ignition Device program for first time Los Angeles DUI offenders is moving forward.

As regular readers of this blog may know, as of in January 2010, first time DUI offenders may be forced to install Interlock Ignition Devices in their vehicles as part of a pilot program to deter recidivism. The IID is a breathalyzer-like device that prevents you from turning on your car unless you blow into it and blow a “clean” reading (BAC = 0.00%).

In addition to the mandatory IID installation, first time offenders can face other undesirable penalties for driving under the influence in Southern California such as:

• Mandatory two days (48 hours) behind bars
• Strict terms of probation
• Mandatory alcohol school
• California drivers license suspension for a full year
• Potential elevation of the misdemeanor charge to a felony in the event of an injury DUI
• Fine of $1,000
• Court costs (often way in excess of $1,000)
• Unquantifiable anguish, frustration, and lost time dealing with the arrest, and the direct and indirect consequences of the arrest

4. Former DUI prosecutor now available to help Los Angeles DUI defendants.

Continue reading "Southern California DUI News Updates – Quick Reports on Stuff You Should Know" »

No one wants to be arrested for Southern California DUI, and no one wants to be involved in an injury crash with a driver who has been under the influence. But just how much of a problem is, for instance, driving under the influence in Beverly Hills or elsewhere in the state? Has anyone quantified the dangers? And if so, what might the data tell us about how to solve this society-wide problem – or at least build towards a long-term resolution of it?

Before we start thinking in grand terms and trying to diagnose a solution for the system, take a gander at the following 12 statistics about driving under the influence in Southern California:

1) Of the car accidents in the United States that result in teen deaths, 60% involve alcohol or drugs.
2) Kids drink. Nearly three out of four teenagers in the United States have drunk alcohol; 10% of kids aged 12 to 13 drink alcohol at least once every month.
3) In the United States, nearly three people die an hour in alcohol related car, truck, and motorcycle accidents.
4) Teenage boys who drive with BAC levels ranging from 0.05% to 0.10% are nearly 20 times more likely to get into a car crash than are teenage boys who drive sober.
5) Teenage girls who drive within that BAC range are more than 50 times more likely than sober teenage girls to get into a motor vehicle accident.
6) According to various surveys, somewhere between 10% and 12% of all drivers on US roads has consumed some alcohol.
7) One survey suggests that someone with a BAC level of 0.15% (nearly twice California’s legal limit) is nearly 400 times more likely to be killed in a crash than a sober driver.
8) In 2008, there were 3,434 fatalities on California’s roads, of which 1,198 were alcohol related. Of these, 1,029 involved drivers who were driving above the legal limit of 0.08%.
9) 2008’s numbers are actually BETTER than numbers in the past. For instance, in 1987, California’s roads saw 5,504 fatalities, of which 2,961 were alcohol related and 2,354 involved drivers who were driving with a BAC of 0.08% or higher. (These stats come from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration).
10) DUI arrests have dropped nearly 50% since the CA State Legislature enacted a law in 1990 that stipulated that the legal limit for BAC would be 0.08%.
11) But Southern California DUI arrests may be on the increase. In 2006, for instance, 197,248 people were arrested for DUI in the state; in 2007, 203,866 people were arrested for DUI.
12) Anecdotal and statistical evidence suggests that the quality of your DUI defense attorney can make a major difference in terms of your sentencing.

If you or a family member has been charged with driving under the influence in Hollywood or elsewhere in Southern California, the choice of your attorney can be incredibly important in terms of your future and finances.

Continue reading "12 Scary Statistics about Southern California DUI" »

For years, we have been treated to a media spectacle: a seemingly endless parade of celebrity Los Angeles DUI violators apologizing to us on TV, on radio, and in print. Although Tiger Woods’ mea culpa last Friday had nothing to do directly with the string of celebrity DUIs that have graced our tabloids recently, his apology is in many ways one-of-a-piece with other celebrity self-flagellations we’ve collectively endured.

What is behind the following cycle?

#1. A celebrity does something obviously wrong. (From Nick Nolte to Mel Gibson to Lindsay Lohan to Stephanie Pratt, that “something” has been a Los Angeles DUI. For Tiger Woods, it was a string of infidelities.)

#2. Deny the wrongdoing or diminish it somehow.

#3. When the evidence becomes so overwhelming that the celebrity cannot get out from the glare of the spotlight, capitulate and make public amends.

#4. The public grants absolution (or not), and the celebrity gets off the hook (or not).

#5. The public gets distracted by the next celebrity crime/gaffe/outrageous statement.

If Tiger Woods’ infidelities and celebrity Los Angeles DUI events were victimless crimes, this cycle would be nothing more than frivolous theater for the masses. But real people can and do get hurt. In Tiger’s case, no one was actually physically injured. But in cases of celebrity hit and run accidents, for instance, people and property get damaged.

Moreover, when we see authority figures (celebrities, politicians, athletes) behaving badly, it gives other people a kind of permission to behave badly as well, indirectly.

So how can we solve the seemingly intractable problem of celebrities behaving badly -- committing public infidelities, lying to confidantes and to the public, and driving under the influence in Hollywood and elsewhere in Los Angeles?

Obviously, this blog cannot on its own solve the mess. But what we can do is to sketch out the law a little clearer, so that people can understand it and abide by it better.

Two key laws are found in the California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) and 23152(b). According to 23152(a), if the Southern California police stop you while you are driving DUI or under the influence of drugs, you can be arrested and charged with a misdemeanor or felony. If you wind up convicted of this crime, you can lose your California drivers license, be forced to pay significant fines and court costs, get points on your DMV record, and suffer all sorts of indirect consequences from the arrest and conviction.

23152(b) defines the legal limit for blood alcohol concentration at 0.08%. In other words, if you drive with this BAC or higher, you can be arrested and convicted for driving under the influence.

Building a stout defense to charges of driving under the influence in Beverly Hills or anywhere else in Southern California can challenge even veteran attorneys. The law is complex, and prosecutors tend to come down hard on DUI offenders -- even first time offenders. Fortunately, a good attorney can make a real difference.

Continue reading "Celebrity Los Angeles DUI Arrests and Tiger Woods: The Art of The Public Apology" »

In last Sunday's New York Times, writer Ryan Gabrielson reported that Southern California DUI checkpoints often spell serious trouble for unlicensed motorists. In 2009, nearly 24,000 cars were seized at Southern California DUI checkpoints -- netting around $40 million for the state in fines, towing fees, and other costs. Each impounding can run up to $4,000 or more -- usually much more than many motorists can afford to pay.

Times readers reacted passionately to the story. Some readers argued that the impounding is useful and fair. Others argued that the practice victimizes the poorest people in Southern California and constitutes what's in essence an extra tax on unlicensed drivers.

Those in favor of the police actions argued that uninsured motorists/unlicensed drivers often cause havoc on Southern California roadways. If one of these drivers hits another vehicle and then flees the scene, the driver who got hit (and possibly injured) must foot the bill for repairs and medical costs, if his or her insurance company won't help.

On the other hand, the draconian punishments for non-DUI checkpoint offenders may distract police from their primary mission of stopping driving under the influence in Burbank (and elsewhere). The practice also seriously hurts people who are just scraping by on the margins of society. Take away these people's vehicles, argues the other side, and they may no longer be able to hold down jobs. Some may even turn to crime to pay the bills.

Obviously, this blog can't resolve such a complex and multifaceted issue. But we can provide some basic information to educate Southern California drivers.

For instance, did you know that if you're pulled over for suspected DUI in Southern California, the police will look for so-called objective symptoms of DUI? These symptoms can include, but are not necessarily limited to:

• Fumbling and stumbling
• Slurred or incoherent speech
• Contradictory stories of where you have been, or what you are doing on the road
• Slow or belligerent responses to officer questions
• Inappropriate emotional reactions to being pulled over
• Smell of alcohol on you
• Blurry, bloodshot, or unusually dilated eyes
• Shifty or slovenly appearance
• Poorly maintained vehicle
• Terrible driving

If you or loved one has been pulled over for driving under the influence in Burbank, it may feel like your world is collapsing around you. Who should you talk to? What might happen to you? What steps should you take to defend yourselves against the charges?

Continue reading "Southern California DUI Checkpoints Used to Nab Unlicensed Drivers: Is This Practice Fair?" »

Celebrity Beverly Hills DUI arrests regularly grace the pages of our tabloid newspapers (see, for instance, DUIs involving Lindsay Lohan, Mel Gibson, Nick Nolte and, most recently, Adrian Pasdar). But the non-celebrities among us do not seem to be faring much better when it comes to avoiding the long arm of the law.

A recent Men’s Health Survey (due to be published in March) finds that 3 of the top 10 “drunkest” cities in United States belong to the Golden State; Riverside, Bakersfield, and Fresno all rank among the “most drunk” cities.

The survey took into account an array of factors. The magazine investigated CDC data re: alcohol liver disease, Southern California DUI fatal car crashes (viz the Fatality Analysis Reporting System), and the total number of DUI arrests (viz the FBI). The magazine even cross-compared DUI punishments to assess the relative drunkenness of metropolises.

Fresno ranked as the worst city; Riverside as the fourth worst city; and Bakersfield as the tenth worst city. Curiously, Boston, Massachusetts was the least drunk city. This may come as a surprise to many people, given that Boston is home to Samuel Adams beer as well as to a plethora of colleges, including Harvard, MIT, Boston University and many, many others.

New York City also got off relatively easy in the survey. Perhaps Boston and NYC fared better because the two East Coast cities have lots of public transportation; thus, maybe there were simply fewer opportunities for DUI driving.

Nevertheless, the Men’s Health Survey serves as a sobering reminder of the perils of Southern California DUI -- for both individuals and for our community.

Practically everyone -- from law enforcement officials to criminal defense attorneys representing Hollywood DUI clients -- agrees that driving and alcohol consumption don’t mix and that we need to better fixes for roadway safety. To move in this direction, we must understand when and how to tell whether a driver is intoxicated.

Beverly Hills DUI officers look for an array of symptoms whenever they pull over a suspected driver. These include but are not limited to:

• Disheveled appearance
• Bizarre or dangerous driving
• Poor motor coordination
• Fumbling with driver’s license and registration
• Incoherent or paradoxical stories of where the person has been
• Slow or inappropriate responses to police questions
• Watery eyes
• Smell of alcohol in the car or on the person
• Other inappropriate demeanor or actions

Crafting an intelligent defense to charges of driving under the influence in Beverly Hills means first and foremost understanding what the law stipulates and how the trial process for DUI typically proceeds.

Continue reading "Concerned about Southern California DUI? You’re not alone: Men’s Health Survey rates three CA cities as “drunkest” in the US." »

Would the public and people suspected of driving under the influence in Burbank, Long Beach, and elsewhere in Southern California be better served if police use more accurate methods to test for blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels?

The Breathalyzer device has been a law enforcement staple for decades. Most people -- including most police officers and drivers -- assume that Breathalyzer tests used at DUI checkpoints are pretty accurate.

We take it on faith that these tests work at least well enough to determine guilt or innocence for driving under the influence in Southern California. However, unrefuted analyses show that Breathalyzer readings can be riddled with errors. Let’s examine some of the most common sources of error:

1. Calibration problems

Silicone oxide sensors can be contaminated and influenced by chemicals other than ethyl alcohol (the “active ingredient” in most cocktails and drinks). Both the so-called wet bath method and the dry gas method of calibration have flaws. A failure to recalibrate -- or interference with recalibration -- can lead tests to be widely off the mark.

2. Certain chemical compounds can interfere with readings

Diabetics, most famously, can have acetone levels in their blood that can throw off BAC readings (and thus yield a false positive). A scientific study out of Europe recently found that certain asthma medications can also lead to false positives. Environmental compounds, such as MTBE -- an additive in gasoline -- can also interfere with breathalyzer mechanisms and lead to false positives… as can paint remover, other kinds of alcohols, lacquers, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

3. Variations among people

Variations in human physiology abound, and these can play a not insignificant role. One person’s breath may be “more alcoholic seeming” than another person’s breath -- even though the two subjects may have identical BACs. In other words, someone well above California’s legal limit of 0.08% could test below the legal limit because he has what's known as a high partition ratio. Conversely, a driver who has a low partition ratio (e.g. 1400:1) could have a de-facto BAC level of 0.06% and still test above the legal limit for Long Beach DUI.

4. Officer bias and other issues

Police officers are people too, and they can make mistakes -- both in terms of recording BAC levels and in terms of conveying relevant information up the chain of command.

Also, variations between men and women, variations due to temperature, and variations due to cell volume of the blood of suspects (known as hematocrit) can also lead to skewed results and false positives.

So what should you do if you or a loved one has been slapped with a misdemeanor charge of driving under the influence in Long Beach, and you believe that the Breathalyzer test gave a false positive? Even if the facts are on your side, you still likely need a competent and trial-proven lawyer to help you plead your case.

Continue reading "Should Breathalyzer Tests Be Used on Long Beach DUI Suspects?" »

From Burbank DUI drivers to debris in lanes to ferocious traffic snarls, Southern California's freeways present a gallery of challenges to drivers. Here's a quick guide to the obstacles we frequently encounter thanks to our tangled freeway system.

Rush-hour gridlock from 6 AM through 9 PM... and often on weekends.

The massive, never-abating congestion on freeways like the 10, the 405, and the 101 (but not the 90!) causes much consternation to newbie drivers. Whether you join the queue at six in the morning on the way to work; or you encounter a surprise snarl at 9 PM on a Sunday, be forewarned that stop-and-go traffic can be quite treacherous. Obviously, it's hard to get into a serious injury accident going 5 mph. But when traffic thaws - after an obstacle is removed from the road, for instance - conditions can become quickly fluid, and accidents can easily occur. Just like a melting glacier presents challenges to hikers walking on top of it, so can a flowing traffic jam be extra dangerous to cars caught in the middle of it. So when the traffic breaks up, be on extra alert.

Freeways at night can turn into grand prix racing grounds.

The 405 is not always packed with cars, contrary to the impressions of daily commuters. At night, Southern California's capacious freeways empty out. This attracts a different kind of hazard -- the speedster. As reported on our Southern California DUI blog, a local television actor (Adrian Pasdar) was arrested just last week for driving 94 mph on the 405 near Santa Monica Blvd. DUI drivers, careless drivers, bad lighting, and highway maintenance projects can turn freeways into veritable obstacle courses.

Distractible drivers.

Southern Californians have an ongoing (and unfortunate... for many reasons) love affair with the cell phone/personal digital assistant. Driving while texting or talking on a cell phone can be hugely problematic -- perhaps even more dangerous than driving under the influence in Southern California. A recent study found that California's anti-cellphone-while-driving law has not resolved the problem -- perhaps because the law required only that drivers speak on headsets instead of requiring that they refrain from talking on the phone altogether while driving.

In any event, by paying extra attention to the road -- and not yapping on the cell phone, getting distracted by billboards or local celebrity sightings, or sightings of paparazzi spotting local celebrities -- you can hopefully mitigate some of the risks posed by other distracted drivers.

Understand the penalties for driving under the influence in Burbank and elsewhere in Southern California.

Many people think that getting a first-time DUI is akin to getting a speeding ticket. But a DUI is no mere infraction. According to the law, even a first-time DUI offender can be charged with a misdemeanor -- or even a felony, depending on the circumstances. If you're convicted of even a misdemeanor Burbank DUI, the court can impose a crushing array of penalties including but not limited to:

* minimum of 48 hours in jail (two full days)
* court costs and fines of potentially thousands of dollars
* mandatory alcohol school in probation
* suspension of license for a full year
* pursuant to a law that went into effect on January 1, first time DUI offenders must install an interlock ignition device (IID) in their vehicles. This means that you must blow into a Breathalyzer-like device every time you want to start your car.

Obviously, the punishments for driving DUI in Burbank are unpleasant, to say the least. But what can you do if you or a loved one has been arrested and charged?

There are many wrong paths to take. If you lack knowledge of how the court system processes Southern California DUIs, you could easily take one of these inferior paths and compromise your future. Fortunately, good help is available.

Continue reading "Burbank DUI Drivers and Other Hazards: How to Handle Southern California's Wild Freeways" »

The problem of driving under the influence in West Hollywood is a perennial one. On weekend nights and certain holidays (especially Halloween), the surface streets in West Hollywood become extremely hazardous to both pedestrians and drivers. Here, we provide some tips for how to (hopefully) drive safer and smarter in and around the City of West Hollywood.

1. Limit your driving on party nights.

As long time residents know, the City of West Hollywood comes alive on weekend nights -- particularly along the stretch of Santa Monica Boulevard from Doheny east to La Cenega. The Sunset Strip (to the north) is also the site of many arrests for DUI in Hollywood.

Hard partying drivers pose risks not only to other cars on the roads but also to pedestrians. According to authors Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner (SuperFreakonomics), walking while under the influence of alcohol may be even MORE dangerous than driving under the influence, per mile traveled. So pedestrians and drivers alike should be particularly cautious in the “party zones” -- especially during weekends and holidays.

2. DUI drivers who get distracted while looking for parking spots can be doubly dangerous.

Parking restrictions abound in West Hollywood. Trying to finagle a parking space, especially near the clubs and restaurants along Robertson, Santa Monica Boulevard, and La Cienega Blvd, can be perilous even if you're driving sober and in the middle of the day. The constant cat and mouse game that is the quest to find parking in West Hollywood can result in drivers becoming extremely distracted. When you combine this with alcohol in any form, the dangers skyrocket.

3. Certain intersections have a reputation for being unwieldy.

The intersections of Santa Monica Boulevard with north-south streets like Fairfax, La Cienega, and Doheny, for instance, can get crowded and competitive during rush hour. So be extra mindful at these big intersections. Watch for drivers cutting across traffic or breaking other rules.

4. DUI in West Hollywood dangers can actually increase when fewer cars are on the roads.

During the day, when most of Los Angeles is stuck in a perpetual traffic gridlock, cars obviously have to drive slower, and thus the potential dangers of injuries from certain collisions decrease. When the traffic frees up -- during the evening hours and sometimes in the weekends -- cars naturally speed up. While this makes getting around West Hollywood a little easier, it also poses problems. DUI in Hollywood collisions are more likely to lead to injuries and death, for instance. This hazard can be compounded on the weekends because certain neighborhoods will clog up with traffic (people going into and out of popular clubs and restaurants), and thus there's a lot of stop and go action on the roads, which can make things even scarier -- particularly when you add DUI in West Hollywood drivers to the mix.

The laws governing DUI in West Hollywood are the same as the laws that govern DUI elsewhere in the state. Two sections of the law are particularly relevant -- California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) and California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b). These sections outline precisely what constitutes the crime of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs and sets forth the (many) punishments that can be handed out to violators. Two related laws, California Vehicle Code Section 23153(a) and California Vehicle Code Section 23153(b), outline the crime of Southern California DUI with injury and stipulate the punishments for that crime.

To build a stiff defense against any of these charges, it helps to retain a lawyer who has a deep working understanding of Southern California judicial system from both the prosecutorial and defense side.

Continue reading "DUI in West Hollywood Dangers -- How to Avoid Them" »

The California Supreme Court agreed that while Los Angeles DUI checkpoints are legal, even though they stop people without probable cause. The Court ruled that since the California DUI checkpoints are not criminal investigations in themselves, they are simply tool stop or deter drunk drivers.

That is why a top rated Los Angeles DUI Defense Attorney can ensure that your rights are being properly protected. Aggressive representation is necessary to protect the rights of those who enter a California DUI checkpoint and are arrested for a Los Angeles DUI.

While the Court had agreed that they were legal, they reiterated certain requirements. The justices stated that the DUI checkpoints must adhere to the guideline that the checkpoint must be publicly advertised.

Continue reading "Los Angeles DUI Checkpoints Found to be Legal by California Supreme Court" »

The dangers of driving under the influence in Burbank have increased dramatically, thanks to the drenching rain that has doused the Southland. AccuWeather projections predict that the rain will last at least until (or through) Friday, potentially causing local flooding, traffic snarls, and changes to typical freeway congestion patterns.

How does heavy rain impact risk for Burbank DUI?

Rain in general can increase driving dangers, including the dangers from Southern California DUI

Rain reduces visibility, causes windows to fog up, slicks up road with oil and debris, increases risk of hydroplaning, and disrupts normal traffic patterns.

Weather related confusion alters driver perceptions about what constitutes safe driving and what constitutes dangerous behavior.

Rain can make certain driving decisions appear more or less dangerous than they actually are. For instance, let's say you're driving through a flooded freeway. You might be thus inclined to be more cautious than you normally would -- and this overcompensation would result in a net improvement in safety over how you normally drive. On the other hand, rain keeps some people off the roads. Thus, you might interpret this absence of traffic as a "green light" to go faster, and this would result in your driving less safely than you normally would.

Most accidents result from multiple "things going wrong" -- rain can be the element that causes a driving situation to cross the threshold from near-miss to accident

According to the statistical analyses of auto and airplane crashes, accidents often result from multiple errors strung together. Consider a theoretical plane crash. The pilot may be more fatigued than usual; he might be flying into foggy weather; his instrument panel might be below grade; and his copilot might be distracted due to a fight he had earlier in the morning with his brother. Taken individually, these factors might not lead to an accident. Taken together, however, these x-factors could create a lethal mix... and lead to a plane crash.

To bring us back from this digression... the implication is that additional road risk factors, such as the rain beating down on Southern California, can (at least theoretically) increase the likelihood that "close calls" wind up as accidents. For instance, let's say there is a guy who's driving DUI in Burbank. Under ordinary situations, he would steer clear of obstacles. But add in the element of rainsoaked highways, and this could cause enough of a disturbance to lead to an accident.

Obviously, history works in only one direction, and there's no way to analyze these kinds of counterfactuals.

Given the increased risks out there, now might be a useful time to do a quick refresher course on the common DUI symptoms. These include but are not limited to: disheveled appearance, mumbling speech, bloodshot eyes, incoherent storytelling, verbal gaffes, clear misstatements of fact, bad driving, and poor motor control/stumbling.

Whether you face a first-time misdemeanor charge of Encino DUI, or you're battling a complicated DUI manslaughter in Long Beach charge, good legal help is a must.

Continue reading "Burbank DUI Risks Increase Due to Torrential Rains" »

One of most powerful Republican State Senate leaders North of Los Angeles was arrested for a DUI. Utah State Senate Majority Leader Sheldon Killpack was arrested for driving under the influence and one day later he resigned from office.

The irony of the arrest is that the State Senate leader was one of the biggest proponents of drunk driving laws. After speaking with his DUI defense attorney, Killpack decided that he would be a distraction if he remained in the legislature, and so he quit his political post.

Killpack's father was killed by a drunk driver when the legislator was a teenager. Since being elected to the State Senate, he has championed victim's rights.

This past Friday night a Utah Highway Patrol trooper observed Killpack's vehicle driving erratically. When he was stopped, the trooper noticed that the legislator had a strong smell of alcohol. After being asked to perform field sobriety tests he refused to take a breath test. The trooper then took the unusual step of seeking a warrant to take blood. Killpack was then booked into jail and later released

Continue reading "High Ranking Republican Arrested For DUI....But Not A Los Angeles DUI" »

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) monitors trends regarding fatal Southern California DUI incidences. A close look at the recent stats points to many positive developments and some concerns. Let's consider the stats over the past 30 years to wee how the dangers of DUI in Southern California have evolved. (We believe that it's crucial to regularly step back from analyzing DUI headlines and inspecting the latest CA DUI laws to get perspective on the size and scope of the issues drivers face.)

In the early 1980s, driving in Southern California was extremely dangerous -- much much more so than it is today. In 1982, for instance, over 60% of CA's traffic fatalities were alcohol-related. There were 4,615 total roadside fatalities, 2,799 of which were alcohol-related; and 2,484 of the alcohol-related fatalities involved drivers who tested over the state's legal limit of 0.08%.

Due to a variety of factors, including increased awareness of the dangers of driving under the influence in Los Angeles, stronger enforcement of DUI and seatbelt laws, and better car safety engineering, alcohol-related fatality rates plunged over the next several years, even as the total number of California roadside fatalities increased. The high watermark hit in 1987, when 5,504 died on California's roads -- 2,961 of whom did so in alcohol-related crashes.

Over the next eleven years (1987-1998), both the total number of fatal accidents and the number of alcohol-related fatalities declined, bottoming out in 1998 at 3,494 (total) and 1,367 (alcohol-related). This decline could be almost entirely accounted for by the decline in alcohol-related fatalities.

Unfortunately, over the next seven or eight years, the downward trend reversed itself for both total and alcohol-related fatalities. By 2005, the numbers rose to 4,329 (total) and 1,719 (DUI related). Since the 2005 high water mark, however, the numbers have reversed yet again. In 2008, there were only 3,434 total fatalities on the road, of which only 1,198 were alcohol related.

Of course, analyzing statistics like these can lead to misguided conclusions. It is very difficult to tease out cause from correlation. Even when you have good statistical data, and you can identify strong correlations between two variables, to prove cause requires a much higher logical burden of proof.

Not all DUI related fatalities are charged as felonies. Some accidents can result in charges of DUI vehicular manslaughter. Other accidents can lead to charges of gross vehicular manslaughter. Still others -- so-called Watson Murders -- can be DUI murders.

To respond effectively to any of these charges, you likely need a trial-proven lawyer to help you.

Continue reading "Southern California DUI Fatalities Trending Downwards over Past Several Years" »