Los Angeles Criminal Defense Attorney Blog

On June 7, a Riverside, California man named Rene Montes entered a guilty plea for dozens of counts of Southern California insurance fraud. The California Department of Insurance reported that Montes pled guilty to felony conspiracy, three counts of felony tax evasion, 59 counts of felony insurance fraud and 59 grand theft felony counts. Sentencing has been set for the end of July. Montes allegedly bilked insurance companies out of $1.5 million by perpetrating a scam to collect funds from AIG Claim Services with respect to outstanding workers’ compensation medical liens.

According to reports, Montes perpetrated the scam from around August 2003 through January 2006. Three other people have also been charged in connection with this Southern California insurance fraud: 47-year-old Cara Cruz-Thomson, 46-year-old Hector Porrata, and 43-year-old George Martinez. The three co-defendants were sentenced in the beginning of May for their connection with the scam. Porrata pled guilty to 50 counts each of grand theft felony and felony insurance fraud as well one felony count of conspiracy. The court ordered him to pay out $1.2 million and serve an 8-year prison sentence. Cruz-Thomson pled guilty to 11 counts each of grand theft and insurance fraud as well as a conspiracy count. She received a two-year prison sentence and an order to pay more than $220,000 in restitution. Martinez also pled guilty to 11 counts of grand theft and insurance fraud as well as a count of conspiracy. He also got a two-year prison sentence and an order to pay around $300,000 in restitution.

The Orange County District Attorney’s office and California Department of Insurance worked together for months to unpack all the subtleties of this Southern California white collar crime.

If you or a loved one faces similar charges, you’ll likely need an attorney who has experience and facility with complex civil and criminal matters to develop a winning strategy.

Attorney Michael Kraut of the Kraut Law Group in Los Angeles has ample experience with Southern California white collar crimes. In his former career as a senior Deputy District Attorney for Los Angeles, he boasted a 98% success rate at jury trials. He is Harvard Law School educated, and he leverages his connections from his stint as a prosecutor to advocate for the best interest of his clients.

The charges you face are real. Get real about your defense by connecting today with Attorney Kraut to build your best defense.

Most cases of Southern California credit card fraud fail to make the headlines, either because they involve relatively insignificant sums of money or because they involve people and corporations that everyday people don’t know or care much about.

However, a breaking story out of Indianapolis has heads swiveling across the nation. A Pro Ball receiver for Indianapolis Colts – Reggie Wayne – is locked in a heated battle with an ex-girlfriend over allegations that she fraudulently misappropriated his credit cards to the tune of nearly $100,000.

The Indianapolis Star quoted a local police sergeant, Paul Thompson, about the matter: “We found that over approximately one year of time that $60,000 of cash and $35,000 of merchandize had been misappropriated by the use of a debit card or credit card number.” Wayne’s ex-girlfriend, 26-year-old Natasha McKenzie, downplayed the charges to a local radio station, saying in effect that Wayne had authorized her to use the card. But Sergeant Thompson insisted that McKenzie had admitted to the police that she used the card without authorization.

After being alerted by Wayne in April, the Indianapolis police conducted an investigation and eventually got a warrant to search McKenzie’s apartment. Last week, the police went over to her residence. She was not home, so they forced entry (which was allowed by the warrant) and confiscated property that was ID’d as having been purchased with Wayne’s credit card. This property included a living room set, some TVs, and other equipment – as well as property that she allegedly purchased with cash taken from the card.

Reggie’s representatives have so far declined to comment about the ongoing investigation, although Southern California credit card fraud experts believe that the drama between Wayne and his ex may escalate and become more public as more details trickle out.

If you or a loved one has been arrested and charged with credit card fraud in Southern California, prosecutors may charge you under various sections of the California Penal Code. For instance, mail theft is charged under Penal Code Section 530.5(e); whereas receiving stolen property is charged under Penal Code Section 496(a). If you make a false financial statements, prosecutors can charge you under Penal Code Section 532a(1); whereas if you unlawfully access credit card activity, you will subject to punishment under Penal Code Section 484i(c).

The reason we are bandying about these various penal code sections is to illustrate just how complicated even a simple charge of Southern California credit card fraud can become. To that end, whether you face a simple charge or a complex series of charges in conjunction with credit card fraud, mail fraud, or any other white collar crime in Southern California, it behooves you to get solid legal representation.

Continue reading "Southern California Credit Card Fraud Analysts Keenly Watching Reggie Wayne Drama Unfold" »

The Wall Street Journal reported on May 21st that a major real estate developer, Anthony Symmes, has pled guilty to charges of Southern California fraud – and seven other people have been indicted on similar charges. The 59-year old Symmes is the most prolific house builder in the Chico region, and he is alleged to have developed a scheme to sell over 60 houses to earn illegal profits. In addition to the money laundering count, Symmes pled guilty to Southern California mail fraud. The developer has paid $4 million in restitution already into a US Treasury account, and he is cooperating with investigators who are looking into Southern California mortgage fraud charges against another area magnate, Garret Gilliland.

The Wall Street Journal also reported that Sacramento resident, Eric Mortenson, along with two men from Las Vegas, have been indicted on Southern California wire fraud charges in conjunction with a scheme to illegally flip properties for resale. The defendants could get up to two decades in jail if convicted.

Lastly, four Redding, California residents were charged with a smattering of Southern California fraud charges, including money laundering, mail fraud, and conspiracy to commit mail fraud. If convicted, they can face fines of up to $0.25 million as well as 30 years in jail.

Southern California white-collar crimes are taken very seriously by the court system. Different penal code sections cover different crimes, and these cases can often get very complicated and technical. Consider, for instance, that perjury is covered by Penal Code Section 118, mail theft is covered by Penal Code Section 530.5(e), and receiving stolen property is covered by Penal Code Section 496(a). Often, these cases involve extensive paper trails, numerous parties, allegations and counter allegations, and both subtle and glaring violations of business ethics and the law.

To that end, if you or a family member has been charged with Southern California fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud, or any other kind of white-collar crime, you need an attorney who has the wherewithal, skills, and experience to develop an effective strategy for you.

Continue reading "Indictments and Guilty Pleas in Major Southern California Fraud Cases" »

The epidemic of celebrity Southern California DUI stories has provoked a national discussion over policy and road safety. Just last week, for instance, as this blog reported, Corey Dillon -- a former NFL runningback and a member of the 2004 Patriots (Super Bowl Champions) -- was arrested for driving under the influence in Malibu. Stories like Dillon’s break all the time, unfortunately, sending the wrong message to impressionable drivers. These incidents sear into the collective memory. Who could forget the Nick Nolte DUI mugshot or the loaded comments Mel Gibson allegedly made after his DUI arrest? Truly outlandish DUIs happen to “everyday” people, as well. Here are three fascinating examples from the DUI news annals:

1. DUI Driver Injures Judge who Originally Sentenced Him for DUI

This story, from mid-April out of Maryland, is both ironic and tragic. A driver named Rene Fernandez careened into a car containing Judge Edwin Collier and his wife Ellen, causing severe injuries to both husband and wife. Fernandez had come before Judge Collier more than a decade ago on charges of DUI. Collier gave him a suspended sentence – let him go without jail time.

2. Women Arrested for Driving DUI on Train Tracks

This is a story from late February 2010 in Redding, Pennsylvania. A local 65-year-old woman named Bonnie Lehfeldt was driving after her dog who had gotten loose. Her Nissan Sedan got stuck on some train tracks. A local man managed to pull her from her car in the nick of time – right before a train plowed into the Nissan and pushed it for 200 feet. Had Lehfeldt been in the car when the collision occurred, she likely would have been killed or at least seriously injured. Police arrested her for DUI.

3. DUI while Piloting a Motorized Armchair

This story, from November of last year, involved a 61-year-old man who drove a motorized armchair out of a pub and into a parking lot while having a blood alcohol concentration of three times the legal limit.

Remember, even if you are not driving a car, truck, or motorcycle, you can still be pulled over for driving under the influence in Southern California!

California Vehicle Code Sections 23153(a) and 23153(b) govern what happens in cases of driving under the influence in Los Angeles with injury. Depending on the circumstances of the injury, the DUI driver can be hit with a felony charge (instead of a standard misdemeanor) and, as a result, can face much stricter penalties including the loss of the right to vote as well as higher fines and longer jail time.

Whether you have been pulled over for a “standard” Los Angeles DUI or a complicated injury DUI in Los Angeles, you likely need effective and compassionate help with your legal case.

Continue reading "As if Celebrity Southern California DUI Arrests were Not Wild Enough… 3 Totally Bizarre DUI News Stories" »

Websites like RadarOnline, PopEater, and Perez Hilton’s blog constantly report on the latest celebrity Los Angeles DUI news. Over the past decade alone, we have seen some of our most beloved TV and movie stars -- including Lindsay Lohan, Paris Hilton, Nick Nolte, Stephanie Pratt and, perhaps most famously, Mel Gibson -- get arrested for DUI in Los Angeles (and elsewhere). But one DUI-related story that’s often not covered by the “mainstream” celebrity blog-press is the rash of lawnmower DUI arrests -- a crime that appears to be becoming increasingly common, however bizarre it may seem to most readers.

Consider the following stories that have broken just in the past month alone.

1. On April 6th, a 47-year-old Lancaster, New York resident named Joseph Simme was arrested after driving under the influence on his lawnmower on Walden Avenue. He nearly hit several vehicles. Fortunately, police pulled him over and found that he had many prior DWI charges as well as a revoked license. Upon testing, it was revealed that he had a BAC of 0.14% (remember, the legal limit for Southern California DUI is 0.08%). He was charged with multiple felony counts.

2. Just six days later -- on April 12th, a man named Martin McMurray of Blountville, Indiana was also busted for lawnmower DUI, after leading police on a low-speed chase for nearly half a mile (thus despite the fact that police loudspeakers were blaring and sirens were wailing). McMurray allegedly drove against traffic and nearly lost his balance after being pulled over.

3. Just two days after that, on April 14th, a 30-year-old man named Jimmy Graham Jr. was busted in Athens, Tennessee for DUI on a lawnmower. He allegedly stole some fishing poles from a local resident’s garage and then took off on his lawnmower. He is currently charged with theft and aggravated burglary as well as DUI.

Could a lawnmower DUI in Los Angeles be next?

Perhaps not. Remember, Los Angeles is an urban environment. All aforementioned arrests happened in the suburbs/rural areas. And fewer people ride lawnmowers here, so one might expect fewer lawnmower Los Angeles DUIs. Nevertheless, the prospect of a lawnmower Southern California DUI does loom large, particularly as spring blooms and we head into summer -- when the bulk of lawn maintenance is done in Southern California.

Of course, as intriguing as lawnmower DUI might be to the casual reader, the charge of a Long Beach DUI is no laughing matter, neither for defendants, nor for the victims of any DUI accident.

If you or a loved one has been tagged for driving under the influence in Long Beach, you may need legal representation.

Continue reading "More Bizarre than Even the Most Outlandish Celebrity Southern California DUI Charges -- Lawnmower DUIs!" »

Most Southern California DUI cases involve simple roadside stops or failures at sobriety checkpoints. These stops tend to be no-drama affairs -- perhaps involving someone driving under the influence in Burbank with a BAC of 0.09% following a night out at a bar in the town center.

But every once in a while, truly bizarre DUI arrests occur. The website TruTV.com recently put up an amusing catalog of notoriously strange DUI arrests. These include:

o Afredo Martinez of Reno, who allowed his 7-year old son to get behind the wheel;
o Tina Williams, who continued to drink beer in front of the police while being questioned about driving DUI -- all while a 16-month year old infant was in her car!
o Lynn Bailey, who got pulled over in Florida while wearing a shirt that read “I’m Not an Alcoholic. I’m a Drunk. Alcoholics go to meetings.”
o A Reno woman named April Westfall, who had been driving around with six feet of gas station hose sticking out of her tank when she got pulled over for suspicion of DUI.

Other bizarre stories of Southern California DUI (and DUI elsewhere in the US) include:

o A husband who pulled over his own wife for DUI;
o A father jacked up on cocaine who allowed a 10-year old boy to drive his vehicle -- the 10-year-old crashed the car at over 100 miles per hour;
o A woman named Terri Comer, who passed out behind the wheel of her Toyota with a BAC of a mind-boggling 0.72% (9 times the legal limit for a Southern California DUI) -- right next to a flashing road sign lit up with the words “don’t drink and drive.”

As amusing as these accounts of bizarre arrests may be, they demonstrate just how helpless many drivers are to control themselves and their behavior. When someone drives under the influence in Beverly Hills or Glendale, that person puts others at risk. What’s more, punishments for DUI with injury can be far more severe.

Consider that most DUI stops lead to charges under either California Vehicle Code Section 23152(a) or 23152(b) but that DUI injury is charged under two separate statutes, 23153(a) and 23153(b). These other statutes stipulate that standard misdemeanor DUI charges can be inflated to felony counts if a DUI driver hurts another person. The severe punishments could entail lengthy prison sentences, forced restitution to a victim (or a victim’s family), major court fines, loss of a right to vote, loss of a job, and so on.

That said, just because someone drives DUI in Glendale and gets into an injury accident doesn’t necessarily mean that he or she will be charged under 23153(a) or 23153(b). To make a case, prosecutors must show that the driver violated a traffic law or in some other way behaved with negligence -- and that this behavior caused an accident, which in turn caused an injury. In other words, say you were DUI in Glendale and you hit another car, causing injury. If the other driver was solely responsible for the accident -- for instance, if his vehicle suddenly swerved into your lane -- you likely will not be hit with the tougher charges, although you likely will still face charges under 23152(a) and/or 23152(b).

Continue reading "Completely Bizarre Southern California DUI Stories (and stories from elsewhere in the U.S.)" »

According to California Vehicle Code Section 23152(b), a motorist who drives with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or higher can be arrested and charged with a Southern California DUI. Often, drivers significantly exceed this minimum number. But how bad can it get? We’re going to discuss the levels of impairment that affect drivers as their BAC levels increase.

Between 0.03% and 0.05% BAC, reaction time is slow, and certain commercial drivers may be considered DUI at this level. The American Medical Association (AMA) has recommended that states lower their legal limit to 0.05%.

0.08% – As we just discussed, this is the cut-off for Southern California DUI.

0.10% - Most people begin to experience a significant loss of coordination and balance as well as failure of muscle control. Other states (not California) have this marker as their legal limit.

0.17% – According to statistical analyses, this is the average BAC for drivers who get into fatal collisions.

0.20% – At this level, drivers lose control over their emotions.

0.30 to 0.35% – Blackouts, incoherence, and complete disorientation can occur at this level.

0.50% – This could cause death.

0.74% – This is the highest BAC level ever recorded by a hospital in the United States.

0.914% – In December 2004, a Bulgarian man who hit a car was taken to a hospital and measured to have a 0.914% BAC. The doctors were so stunned by this measurement that they tried him with five different tests, which supported this amazing BAC reading.

1.23% – a Polish man that same month (December 2004) was astonishingly measured to have a 1.23% BAC. Some people doubt the veracity of this claim.

Since 0.5% BAC is usually enough to lead to death, it’s very rare that people who endure BAC levels of 1% or higher survive, but such incidences apparently do occur from time to time.

How Do Police Test for DUI in Burbank?

One common method is the blood test. This is considered the most accurate method, although, as we will see, it is not necessarily foolproof. A technician will extract blood from a suspect’s vein. The sample is then mixed with certain chemicals, which prevent the blood from clotting, and the blood is then analyzed using series of tests and then sent back to the Law Enforcement Agency for analysis.

Many Things can Go Wrong with DUI in Burbank Blood Tests.

For instance, the sample may not be sterile, or it may not be preserved or refrigerated. The skin could be contaminated by alcohol swabbed on the area to prepare for the blood test. Samples can be mixed up. Errors can be made with the chain of custody. Errors can be made with respect to the chemicals used to prevent clotting and the tests used to analyze the blood.

Of course, since blood tests are generally the most reliable methods to test for BAC, if you’ve been arrested for driving under the influence in Burbank (or elsewhere in Southern California), and your BAC blood test comes up positive for DUI, you may need immediate legal assistance.

Continue reading "What is the Highest Ever BAC Recorded for Someone Pulled Over for Driving Under the Influence in Southern California (or elsewhere)?" »

Nearly every week, news reports announce yet another Burbank DUI arrest. The story lines range widely. Sometimes, it’s a B-List celebrity stopped for speeding on the 101 and found to have a blood alcohol concentration of 0.15%. Other times, it’s a case of an 18-year-old actor who drives after drinking at a house party and winds up totaling his car on Lankershim Blvd. The details and names change. But the story remains the same.

So what’s behind this epidemic?

Scientifically, it may be impossible to say. But we can offer some informed speculation about what might be driving (so to speak) at least some of the Burbank DUI epidemic.

1. Rapidly changing traffic patterns

During the daytime, freeways like the 5, the 101, and the 405 get totally clogged. If you are on these freeways at the wrong time, you may be stuck literally for hours. However, after the traffic “thaws” and the sun goes down, cars suddenly can go at a much more rapid clip. This huge difference in driver behavior (between trafficky times and non-trafficky times) can create confusion and make roads in the Valley more difficult to navigate than roads elsewhere in L.A.

2. It’s easy to get lost.

Okay, the Valley is not exactly Boston: its traffic grid is at least somewhat intelligible. And if you make a wrong turn, you won’t have to drive three miles before getting back on track. But signage can confuse easily. Many areas (particularly along Ventura Boulevard) “look like one another.” As a result, you have probably a higher than average contingent of drivers who don’t know where they are going or who may be searching for directions while driving.

3. Increase in cell phone use in automobiles.

Think back ten years ago. A few people in Burbank had cell phones and pagers and such. But today, cell phones are nearly ubiquitous. Despite California laws forbidding drivers to use mobile devices unless they use hands free headsets, the practical reality is that lots of drivers still talk on their phones by holding them up to their ears. This makes them more distracted and more likely to get into accidents. Thanks to the increased distractibility of drivers, the probability of Burbank DUI crashes goes way up.

4. Burbank is home to a lot of “out of the way” nightspots and clubs.

When you look at party areas of the city of Los Angeles -- such as the Sunset Strip in West Hollywood and Mainstreet in Santa Monica -- these places can be dangerous, sure, but they are at least concentrated in a relatively small location. In the Valley, things are different. Places to drink in Burbank are more spread out. As a result, drivers who hop from club to club or from party to party may be more likely to get into their cars, thus increasing the likelihood that they will get into a Burbank DUI accident or be subject to arrest for DUI in Southern California.

Two California Vehicle Code Sections define what it means to be DUI in Southern California -- sections 23152(a) and 23152(b). 23152(a) lays out the definition and potential punishments for California DUI. 23152(b) stipulates that if you drive a car, truck, or motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08% or above, you can be arrested for DUI.

So, with that lecture on the law and discussion of potential causes of DUI in Pasadena and Burbank and elsewhere in the Valley behind us, let’s turn our attention to legal defenses:

What should you do if you or a family member has been arrested for DUI?

Continue reading "Why Burbank DUI Accidents Happen -- And Steps You Can Take to Avoid Them" »

Most Southern California DUI news stories and blog posts report only on the latest headlines. But sometimes the most important stories percolate for weeks without getting due attention. To that end, let’s examine relevant developments that could impact your driving and your safety.

1. CHP will serve over 6,000 warrants for individuals who’ve ignored DUI court appearances.

According to official sources, the California Highway Patrol is going to serve 6,000 warrants for drivers who were caught driving under the influence in Southern California and elsewhere throughout the state who did not show up for court appearances. These warrants should be out by September 30th. Individuals who have outstanding warrants can turn themselves in. Celebrities are not exempt from this hunt. As this blog reported, Jani Lane, former lead singer of the band Warrant, was issued a warrant last month for failing to show up to a Los Angeles DUI hearing.

2. Increase in traffic fines may be impacting Southern California road safety.

On January 1st, 2009, the California legislature passed a law that increased fines for traffic infractions by up to 150%. The revenues from these fines have paid for construction of new courthouses. The imposition of higher fines should theoretically deter bad driving, but it is uncertain whether the deterrent works. More studies need to be done to demonstrate a clear cause and effect relationship.

3. Mandatory Interlock Ignition Device program for first time Los Angeles DUI offenders is moving forward.

As regular readers of this blog may know, as of in January 2010, first time DUI offenders may be forced to install Interlock Ignition Devices in their vehicles as part of a pilot program to deter recidivism. The IID is a breathalyzer-like device that prevents you from turning on your car unless you blow into it and blow a “clean” reading (BAC = 0.00%).

In addition to the mandatory IID installation, first time offenders can face other undesirable penalties for driving under the influence in Southern California such as:

• Mandatory two days (48 hours) behind bars
• Strict terms of probation
• Mandatory alcohol school
• California drivers license suspension for a full year
• Potential elevation of the misdemeanor charge to a felony in the event of an injury DUI
• Fine of $1,000
• Court costs (often way in excess of $1,000)
• Unquantifiable anguish, frustration, and lost time dealing with the arrest, and the direct and indirect consequences of the arrest

4. Former DUI prosecutor now available to help Los Angeles DUI defendants.

Continue reading "Southern California DUI News Updates – Quick Reports on Stuff You Should Know" »

No one wants to be arrested for Southern California DUI, and no one wants to be involved in an injury crash with a driver who has been under the influence. But just how much of a problem is, for instance, driving under the influence in Beverly Hills or elsewhere in the state? Has anyone quantified the dangers? And if so, what might the data tell us about how to solve this society-wide problem – or at least build towards a long-term resolution of it?

Before we start thinking in grand terms and trying to diagnose a solution for the system, take a gander at the following 12 statistics about driving under the influence in Southern California:

1) Of the car accidents in the United States that result in teen deaths, 60% involve alcohol or drugs.
2) Kids drink. Nearly three out of four teenagers in the United States have drunk alcohol; 10% of kids aged 12 to 13 drink alcohol at least once every month.
3) In the United States, nearly three people die an hour in alcohol related car, truck, and motorcycle accidents.
4) Teenage boys who drive with BAC levels ranging from 0.05% to 0.10% are nearly 20 times more likely to get into a car crash than are teenage boys who drive sober.
5) Teenage girls who drive within that BAC range are more than 50 times more likely than sober teenage girls to get into a motor vehicle accident.
6) According to various surveys, somewhere between 10% and 12% of all drivers on US roads has consumed some alcohol.
7) One survey suggests that someone with a BAC level of 0.15% (nearly twice California’s legal limit) is nearly 400 times more likely to be killed in a crash than a sober driver.
8) In 2008, there were 3,434 fatalities on California’s roads, of which 1,198 were alcohol related. Of these, 1,029 involved drivers who were driving above the legal limit of 0.08%.
9) 2008’s numbers are actually BETTER than numbers in the past. For instance, in 1987, California’s roads saw 5,504 fatalities, of which 2,961 were alcohol related and 2,354 involved drivers who were driving with a BAC of 0.08% or higher. (These stats come from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration).
10) DUI arrests have dropped nearly 50% since the CA State Legislature enacted a law in 1990 that stipulated that the legal limit for BAC would be 0.08%.
11) But Southern California DUI arrests may be on the increase. In 2006, for instance, 197,248 people were arrested for DUI in the state; in 2007, 203,866 people were arrested for DUI.
12) Anecdotal and statistical evidence suggests that the quality of your DUI defense attorney can make a major difference in terms of your sentencing.

If you or a family member has been charged with driving under the influence in Hollywood or elsewhere in Southern California, the choice of your attorney can be incredibly important in terms of your future and finances.

Continue reading "12 Scary Statistics about Southern California DUI" »

In last Sunday's New York Times, writer Ryan Gabrielson reported that Southern California DUI checkpoints often spell serious trouble for unlicensed motorists. In 2009, nearly 24,000 cars were seized at Southern California DUI checkpoints -- netting around $40 million for the state in fines, towing fees, and other costs. Each impounding can run up to $4,000 or more -- usually much more than many motorists can afford to pay.

Times readers reacted passionately to the story. Some readers argued that the impounding is useful and fair. Others argued that the practice victimizes the poorest people in Southern California and constitutes what's in essence an extra tax on unlicensed drivers.

Those in favor of the police actions argued that uninsured motorists/unlicensed drivers often cause havoc on Southern California roadways. If one of these drivers hits another vehicle and then flees the scene, the driver who got hit (and possibly injured) must foot the bill for repairs and medical costs, if his or her insurance company won't help.

On the other hand, the draconian punishments for non-DUI checkpoint offenders may distract police from their primary mission of stopping driving under the influence in Burbank (and elsewhere). The practice also seriously hurts people who are just scraping by on the margins of society. Take away these people's vehicles, argues the other side, and they may no longer be able to hold down jobs. Some may even turn to crime to pay the bills.

Obviously, this blog can't resolve such a complex and multifaceted issue. But we can provide some basic information to educate Southern California drivers.

For instance, did you know that if you're pulled over for suspected DUI in Southern California, the police will look for so-called objective symptoms of DUI? These symptoms can include, but are not necessarily limited to:

• Fumbling and stumbling
• Slurred or incoherent speech
• Contradictory stories of where you have been, or what you are doing on the road
• Slow or belligerent responses to officer questions
• Inappropriate emotional reactions to being pulled over
• Smell of alcohol on you
• Blurry, bloodshot, or unusually dilated eyes
• Shifty or slovenly appearance
• Poorly maintained vehicle
• Terrible driving

If you or loved one has been pulled over for driving under the influence in Burbank, it may feel like your world is collapsing around you. Who should you talk to? What might happen to you? What steps should you take to defend yourselves against the charges?

Continue reading "Southern California DUI Checkpoints Used to Nab Unlicensed Drivers: Is This Practice Fair?" »

Would the public and people suspected of driving under the influence in Burbank, Long Beach, and elsewhere in Southern California be better served if police use more accurate methods to test for blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels?

The Breathalyzer device has been a law enforcement staple for decades. Most people -- including most police officers and drivers -- assume that Breathalyzer tests used at DUI checkpoints are pretty accurate.

We take it on faith that these tests work at least well enough to determine guilt or innocence for driving under the influence in Southern California. However, unrefuted analyses show that Breathalyzer readings can be riddled with errors. Let’s examine some of the most common sources of error:

1. Calibration problems

Silicone oxide sensors can be contaminated and influenced by chemicals other than ethyl alcohol (the “active ingredient” in most cocktails and drinks). Both the so-called wet bath method and the dry gas method of calibration have flaws. A failure to recalibrate -- or interference with recalibration -- can lead tests to be widely off the mark.

2. Certain chemical compounds can interfere with readings

Diabetics, most famously, can have acetone levels in their blood that can throw off BAC readings (and thus yield a false positive). A scientific study out of Europe recently found that certain asthma medications can also lead to false positives. Environmental compounds, such as MTBE -- an additive in gasoline -- can also interfere with breathalyzer mechanisms and lead to false positives… as can paint remover, other kinds of alcohols, lacquers, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs).

3. Variations among people

Variations in human physiology abound, and these can play a not insignificant role. One person’s breath may be “more alcoholic seeming” than another person’s breath -- even though the two subjects may have identical BACs. In other words, someone well above California’s legal limit of 0.08% could test below the legal limit because he has what's known as a high partition ratio. Conversely, a driver who has a low partition ratio (e.g. 1400:1) could have a de-facto BAC level of 0.06% and still test above the legal limit for Long Beach DUI.

4. Officer bias and other issues

Police officers are people too, and they can make mistakes -- both in terms of recording BAC levels and in terms of conveying relevant information up the chain of command.

Also, variations between men and women, variations due to temperature, and variations due to cell volume of the blood of suspects (known as hematocrit) can also lead to skewed results and false positives.

So what should you do if you or a loved one has been slapped with a misdemeanor charge of driving under the influence in Long Beach, and you believe that the Breathalyzer test gave a false positive? Even if the facts are on your side, you still likely need a competent and trial-proven lawyer to help you plead your case.

Continue reading "Should Breathalyzer Tests Be Used on Long Beach DUI Suspects?" »

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) monitors trends regarding fatal Southern California DUI incidences. A close look at the recent stats points to many positive developments and some concerns. Let's consider the stats over the past 30 years to wee how the dangers of DUI in Southern California have evolved. (We believe that it's crucial to regularly step back from analyzing DUI headlines and inspecting the latest CA DUI laws to get perspective on the size and scope of the issues drivers face.)

In the early 1980s, driving in Southern California was extremely dangerous -- much much more so than it is today. In 1982, for instance, over 60% of CA's traffic fatalities were alcohol-related. There were 4,615 total roadside fatalities, 2,799 of which were alcohol-related; and 2,484 of the alcohol-related fatalities involved drivers who tested over the state's legal limit of 0.08%.

Due to a variety of factors, including increased awareness of the dangers of driving under the influence in Los Angeles, stronger enforcement of DUI and seatbelt laws, and better car safety engineering, alcohol-related fatality rates plunged over the next several years, even as the total number of California roadside fatalities increased. The high watermark hit in 1987, when 5,504 died on California's roads -- 2,961 of whom did so in alcohol-related crashes.

Over the next eleven years (1987-1998), both the total number of fatal accidents and the number of alcohol-related fatalities declined, bottoming out in 1998 at 3,494 (total) and 1,367 (alcohol-related). This decline could be almost entirely accounted for by the decline in alcohol-related fatalities.

Unfortunately, over the next seven or eight years, the downward trend reversed itself for both total and alcohol-related fatalities. By 2005, the numbers rose to 4,329 (total) and 1,719 (DUI related). Since the 2005 high water mark, however, the numbers have reversed yet again. In 2008, there were only 3,434 total fatalities on the road, of which only 1,198 were alcohol related.

Of course, analyzing statistics like these can lead to misguided conclusions. It is very difficult to tease out cause from correlation. Even when you have good statistical data, and you can identify strong correlations between two variables, to prove cause requires a much higher logical burden of proof.

Not all DUI related fatalities are charged as felonies. Some accidents can result in charges of DUI vehicular manslaughter. Other accidents can lead to charges of gross vehicular manslaughter. Still others -- so-called Watson Murders -- can be DUI murders.

To respond effectively to any of these charges, you likely need a trial-proven lawyer to help you.

Continue reading "Southern California DUI Fatalities Trending Downwards over Past Several Years" »

1. Battle Los Angeles DUI incidences by improving the efficacy of rehab programs.

Sadly, rehab programs such as certain 12-step programs can be surprisingly ineffective at helping addicts recover from alcoholism. While only a few scientific surveys of groups like AA have been conducted, the results have not been particularly compelling. Indeed, some studies have suggested that 12-step treatment is no more effective than placebo treatment. Conversely, other rehab programs have demonstrated a statistically significant success rate, and perhaps there could be something to be learned from these more successful programs that could be more broadly applied and used to decrease the problem of Los Angeles DUI.


2. Increase prohibition on the use of cell phones and text messaging while driving.

As we’ve discussed elsewhere on this blog, the problem of driving while texting and driving while talking on the cell phone may be as big as -- if not bigger than -- the problem of driving under the influence in Long Beach and elsewhere in the Southland. Although California has made driving while texting illegal, perhaps more attention needs to be focused on this area. If we can reduce general driver distraction, we can likely reduce accidents and injuries on our roads.

3. Improve traffic engineering.

Road construction, bad or ineffective lighting, unclear signage, and other traffic engineering factors likely contribute to a significant percentage of accidents on Southern California roads. More innovative attention to these engineering problems can likely decrease the number of highway crashes significantly.

4. Use “crowd-sourcing” to identify dangerous drivers.

Crowd-sourcing is using aggregated community resources to get things done. Individuals armed with cameras and cell phones can in some circumstances help identify bad drivers and thereby exert social pressure to get them to conform to the laws of the state.

5. An improving economy can lead to more prosperity and more goodwill on the roads.

A depressed economy leads to depressed and distracted drivers. If you're fatigued, in a bad mood, and stressed about finances, chances are you're going to be a less attentive driver. Thus, in a bad economy, chances are that collectively Californians will be more at risk for getting into accidents -- DUI and otherwise. If the economy improves, however, this may likely have a salutary effect on our collective driving behavior.

6. Campaign to raise the awareness of the danger of sleeplessness.

Driver fatigue is a significant contributor to accidents. Unfortunately, most people are not aware of how dangerous it can be to drive while sleepy, stressed, or otherwise out of sorts. A simple statewide educational campaign to explain these dangers could result in safer roadways.

7. Improve road maintenance.

Clearing debris out of lanes on highways and performing other general upkeep should likewise have a salutary effect on road safety.

8. Sell fewer red cars.

Studies show that the color red can inspire aggression in the minds of other drivers. Theoretically, if fewer red cars populated Southern California’s highways and byways, we might see a decrease in driver aggression and thus in accidents and injuries.

9. Improve education for minors about the ABCs of road safety.

Many new Southern California drivers do not understand or appreciate their responsibilities. Likewise, they may not understand the laws regarding DUI -- in Southern California, for instance, if you're under 21 years of age and you are caught with a blood alcohol concentration of just 0.01 percent -- the equivalent of just a few sips of alcohol for some people -- you can be arrested and charged with DUI in Southern California.

10. Provide better legal assistance.

Do you need fast, effective, and professional help with a charge of Los Angeles DUI?

Continue reading "Ten Ideas to Decrease Los Angeles DUI Arrests and Improve Highway Safety in 2010" »

As 2009 wraps up, it’s time to turn our attention to Southern California DUI statistics that engaged our attention and reminded us about the dangers and costs of violating California Vehicle Code Sections 23152(a) and 23152(b).

Here are 9 eye-popping numbers:

1. 28,457 - the number of people hurt in accidents in CA in 2008, in which alcohol played a key role, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

2. 1,029 - the number of people killed in “alcohol impaired motor vehicle fatalities” in CA in 2008. The only state with more alcohol auto fatalities in 2008 was Texas (1,269).

3. 214,811 - the number of DUI arrests made in 2008, according to the CHP.

4. 45 - the number of fatalities that occur every day on US roads during the Christmas season. 36 fatalities per day occur on average. 54 on average die on New Year’s Eve -- 40 percent of these fatalities involve alcohol in some capacity.

5. 2,500 -- The number of 2010 sobriety checkpoints that will be funded by the California Office of Traffic Safety.

6. 4/100,000 -- According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration FARS survey, this is the rate of alcohol-related driving fatalities per population nationally.

7. (way more than) 18 -- the number of celebrity Beverly Hills DUI arrests in 2009. For more on the celeb Los Angeles DUI arrests from January through June 2009, see our blog post from 12/16. For more on the July through December DUI arrests, see our blog post from 12/21.

8. 15-20 -- According to the NHTSA publication “Young Drivers” (2009), motor vehicle accidents are the number one cause of death for young adults age fifteen to twenty.

9. 380 -- according an NHTSA pamphlet called “alcohol impaired driving” (2008), drivers who operate vehicles with BACs of 0.15 percent or greater (it is illegal in California to drive with a BAC of 0.08%) are 380 times more likely to get into Los Angeles DUI crashes that result in death than are sober drivers.

To get effective and reliable help with your DUI charge -- whether it’s a minor misdemeanor Southern California DUI or a serious injury charge -- connect with a reliable lawyer today.

Continue reading "9 Eye-Popping Numbers regarding Southern California DUI in 2009" »

During the last several months, the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office as well as State and local law enforcement have been working diligently to amass a group of Los Angeles fraud cases, medicare fraud cases, and Los Angeles white collar criminal cases against local lawyers and chiropractors. In the last week, two dozen professionals were arrested for white collar fraud cases throughout Southern California and Los Angeles. The lawyers and chiropractors arrested were alleged to have participated in a large scale auto insurance fraud ring that Nearly two dozen men and women, including lawyers and chiropractors, were arrested Tuesday, accused in a large scale auto insurance fraud ring that netted hundreds of thousands of dollars.

There were at least four lawyers and four chiropractors that were arrested during the raid. The auto insurance fraud division of the DA's Office is prosecuting the case. Top rated white collar criminal defense attorneys are being hired to handle these fraud cases.

The lawyers and chiropractors are accused of ripping off over a dozen insurance companies by filing false medical claims and lawsuits. The case has grown to involve more then 28 defendants and may involve a conspiracy that involves in excess of 300 suspects.

The Los Angeles white collar fraud charges stem from a series of Los Angeles grand theft charges, including grad theft of personal property. The attorneys are charged with insurance fraud in Los Angeles County. One attorney also faces money laundering charges.

The charges of grand theft are in violation of Section 487 of the Penal Code. The prosecutors also added the the white collar enhancement under 186.22 of the Penal Code. This section allows for enhanced punishment if the suspect is convicted, including mandatory prison time.

Continue reading "White Collar Crimes in Los Angeles Nab Lawyers and Chiropractors in Fraud Case" »

Celebrity singer and husband to Whitney Houston is wanted for a warrant issued by a judge. Some people think that he is hiding in Los Angeles, California. A Massachusetts judge issued a warrant for the arrest of Bobby Brown after he failed to pay child support. Brown was previously ordered to pay $45,000 in child support to the two teenager children he has from a previous relationship with his former girlfriend, Kim Ward.

The law surrounding warrants in Massachusetts is almost identical to a Los Angeles bench warrant. There are two different ways in which a bench warrant can be issued for the arrest of a person. The first is if a person is wanted for a crime. The judge will issue an arrest warrant. Once that is issued then law enforcement will arrest you and take you into custody. The second way a warrant can be issued is if you were supposed to be in court, or were ordered to do something by a judge and you failed to perform satisfactorily.

A warrant should be cleared as soon as you become aware of one being issued. Otherwise, you might not be able to get the best result on a case. In Los Angeles, a warrant while on probation could harm your chances to have your case expunged after you have completed a grant of probation.

A Los Angeles bench warrant attorney is be able to assist you in getting the warrant recalled and quashed as well as able to help you get a Los Angeles expungement.

Continue reading "Warrant Issued For the Arrest of Bobby Brown...Is He in Los Angeles?" »